What does proposed China component ban mean for autonomous trucks?

In This Article:

Autonomous trucking developers knew the Commerce Department was on the cusp of slamming the door on certain Chinese components. In fact, this week’s preliminary rule came later than expected. Now they have to sort out what it means.

So far, they don’t have much to say. Of the leading driverless trucking companies – two of which could launch before the end of the year – only one, Plus, offered substantive comment. Others demurred or pointed to a less-than-substantive statement from the Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association.

A national security risk

First, some background. On Monday, Commerce issued a notice of proposed rulemaking that would effectively prohibit the import and sale of Chinese and Russian software and hardware commonly found in vehicle connectivity systems (VCS) and automated driving systems (ADS).

The proposal cites national security as the rationale for stopping the integration of specific pieces of software and hardware into U.S.-manufactured vehicles. That includes passenger and commercial vehicles. It also would limit Chinese AV companies from testing and deploying in the U.S. Russia is named but not really a player in connected vehicle software.

“These technologies include computer systems that control vehicle movement and collect sensitive driver and passenger data as well as cameras and sensors that enable automated driving systems and record detailed information about American infrastructure,” stated a White House fact sheet.

Automakers would have four years to remove certain Chinese-affiliated hardware like onboard sensors, connectivity control units, Bluetooth, or antennas and chip sets that allow cars to connect to the internet, according to TechCrunch.

Impact on autonomous trucking

How does this impact autonomous truck developers?

Industry leaders Aurora Innovation and Kodiak Robotics are studying the ruling and offered no comment. Torc Robotics referred to a statement from the Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association, which it recently joined.

AVIA’s statement indicated national security is a good and important thing and commended Commerce for moving rulemaking along.

“American national security is foundational. The autonomous vehicle industry has worked constructively with federal agencies and stakeholders to provide critical information about connected vehicles and how the AV industry works to ensure national security,” AVIA CEO Jeff Farrah said.

Curiously, the autonomous trucking developer with the closest ties to China offered the most definitive statement.

Plus began delivering Level 4 autonomous systems in China in 2021. (Photo: Plus)
Plus began delivering Level 4 autonomous systems in China in 2021. (Photo: Plus)

“Plus’s suite of driver-in to [driverless] autonomous driving solutions does not use any technologies or components that would be affected by the Commerce Department’s proposed ban,” a spokesperson said in an email.