What Retailers Are Worried About for Holiday

Retailers have a lot of worries as they approach the holiday season.

A report from goTRG reveals a retail backdrop influenced by inflation, the upcoming presidential election, and the rise of artificial intelligence (AI). And then there are other growing concerns over rising inventory levels, the problem of returns, and the evolving nature of returns fraud. The survey also notes how some retailers are rejiggering all facets of their holiday strategies from how they time their promotions to adjusting return policies and dealing with fraud prevention.

More from Sourcing Journal

GoTRG is a reverse logistics firm that helps retailers and manufacturers manage retail returns. The company manages 40 million units annually, and sees returns as a $1.5 trillion problem that represents a significant threat to retailers. The company surveyed more than 450 U.S.-based retailers having annual revenue exceeding $750 million, with the respondents holding the title of director or above in areas such as reverse supply chain, reverse logistics, customer returns, supply chain, merchandising or store operations.

According to Sender Shamiss, goTRG’s CEO and co-founder, the top reasons for returns in fashion are “sizing, fit, color and ‘bracketing,’ when a customer buys multiple items of the same product—such as difference sizes, colors, or styles—with the intention of keeping only one and returning the rest.” He also said that during challenging economic times, “we see consumers return items due to buyer’s remorse.”

“The most common online returns are clothing (23 percent), shoes (16 percent), accessories (12 percent), and consumer electronics (10 percent),” Shamiss said, adding that e-commerce is the channel with the most frequent returns, “hovering around 15 percent to 20 percent, with spikes as high as 30 percent during the peak holiday season.”

And while retailers are implementing different ways to curtail the rate of returns, many try to “save the sale” by incentivizing customers to accept credit for the returned item instead of a refund, a move that is presumed to “result in a new purchase for an equal or higher value item,” Shamiss said. He said that what consumers don’t know is that retailers try to discourage them from returning items at third-party partners—FedEx, UPS—by charging them a fee. Even though the fees don’t cover the full cost of processing a return, the charge could influence if and how the consumer will return the items.