Union members reject deal with Boeing, prolonging strike

Union machinists wave signs next to company's factory in Everett, Wash., on Tuesday, Oct. 22, 2024. · CNN Business · Manuel Valdes/AP

In This Article:

The strike by 33,000 workers at Boeing will continue after rank-and-file union members rejected an offer from the company in a vote on Wednesday and decided to remain on the picket lines instead.

The membership of the International Association of Machinists voted 64% against the deal, the union announced late Wednesday. While that was less than the 95% who rejected an earlier offer, it left the vote far short of the simple majority needed to end the strike.

“Our members deserve more,” said Jon Holden, the president of the largest IAM local at Boeing and its chief negotiator. “They’ve spoken loudly, and we’re going to go back to the table to try to achieve those things.”

Boeing said late Wednesday that it did not have a comment on the vote results.

The offer would have raised wages for IAM members at Boeing by 35 percentage points over the four-year life of the contract, with an immediate 12% raise. It would also have paid them a $7,000 signing bonus, increased contributions to union members’ retirement accounts and provided some job security, with the promise that the company’s next commercial jet would be built at a unionized factory rather than a new, non-union plant.

But the ratification is not certain. Union leadership stopped short of endorsing the offer, saying only that it “includes several key improvements” and that “it warrants presenting to the members and is worthy of your consideration.”

The previous tentative agreement that had been recommended by union leadership was almost unanimously rejected by rank-and-file members, sparking the start of the start of the strike on September 13.

Loss of pension a ‘sticking point’

Among the major issues for many members was the loss of a traditional pension plan. Membership narrowly gave up the pension in 2014 after the company threatened to build the 737 Max and 777X at non-union facilities. The loss of the pensions, at a time when Boeing was doing well financially, sparked deep resentment that continues to this day.

While the prop osed contract achieved many of the union’s bargaining goals, and did provide for improved retirement benefits, it did not restore the traditional pension plan. Holden said Wednesday that issue is a “big sticking point for many of our members.”

“This membership has gone through a lot,” he said. “There are some deep wounds that were (created) out of some take aways and concessions, threats of job loss. Our members haven’t forgotten that.”

The rejected agreement would have raised Boeing’s labor costs by more than $1 billion annually, according to an analysis from Seth Seifman, an aerospace analyst at JPMorgan Chase.