Why it's time to avoid work from home stocks

In This Article:

Sean Darby, global chief equity strategist at Jefferies, joins Yahoo Finance Live to discuss why it may be “time to avoid” work-from-home stocks, which outperformed in 2020 as the lockdowns prevented travel and entire economies were temporarily shut down.

Video Transcript

[MUSIC PLAYING]

JULIE HYMAN: It is time to avoid the work from home stocks, so wrote Sean Darby a week ago today in a note to clients. He's the Jefferies Chief Global Equities Strategist, and he is joining us from Hong Kong right now. Sean, thank you for being here. You talk about the achievement, eventually, of herd immunity because of the vaccination rollout. And if we assume that stocks are six to nine month discounting mechanism, I assume that you think then that's around when we'll be achieving herd immunity, and that's why we should maybe avoid those work from home stocks right now.

SEAN DARBY: Well, they've been fantastic performers. And I think no one could have imagined just how far they've been able to move even during what has been one of the worst economic contractions, the reality is that earnings are always a relative game for the equity markets. And as you start to gain herd immunity, go through that 30% threshold towards the sort of critical 70, 80% levels, the banks in particular will start to see their provisioning levels peaking and impairment charges peaking. And for them, which have been perhaps the most sensitive to the coronavirus, they will start to be able to discount a much better environment for earnings. So in reality, it's about one really big sector, which is the banks and also, to some extent, the commercial real estate coming re-franchised as the worst ravages of the coronavirus begin to peter out. So it's a game of relative performance here, and I think the work from home stocks, whilst still having very good attributes in many cases of the balance sheet, that relative ability to grow earnings is going to come much more difficult.

MYLES UDLAND: You know, Sean, I think that the relative framework is such an interesting one, because people get quite zealous about the value versus growth rotation, what it really means, what it doesn't mean. I mean, it sounds, in a backdrop where financials and real estate are doing well, certainly that sounds like value is going to do well. But do people maybe lose the relative, you know, forest for the trees, as it were. People are too focused on, oh, this is values moment. And it sounds like your point is, yes, its values moment relative to the straw, the amazing performance we've seen from the growth-y names in the last year.