Some Investors May Be Worried About Birchcliff Energy's (TSE:BIR) Returns On Capital

In This Article:

To avoid investing in a business that's in decline, there's a few financial metrics that can provide early indications of aging. Businesses in decline often have two underlying trends, firstly, a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining base of capital employed. This indicates the company is producing less profit from its investments and its total assets are decreasing. And from a first read, things don't look too good at Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR), so let's see why.

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. The formula for this calculation on Birchcliff Energy is:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

0.029 = CA$93m ÷ (CA$3.2b - CA$78m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

So, Birchcliff Energy has an ROCE of 2.9%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Oil and Gas industry average of 9.4%.

See our latest analysis for Birchcliff Energy

roce
roce

In the above chart we have measured Birchcliff Energy's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Birchcliff Energy .

What Can We Tell From Birchcliff Energy's ROCE Trend?

In terms of Birchcliff Energy's historical ROCE movements, the trend doesn't inspire confidence. About five years ago, returns on capital were 5.1%, however they're now substantially lower than that as we saw above. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. Companies that exhibit these attributes tend to not be shrinking, but they can be mature and facing pressure on their margins from competition. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on Birchcliff Energy becoming one if things continue as they have.

The Key Takeaway

All in all, the lower returns from the same amount of capital employed aren't exactly signs of a compounding machine. Yet despite these poor fundamentals, the stock has gained a huge 248% over the last five years, so investors appear very optimistic. Regardless, we don't feel too comfortable with the fundamentals so we'd be steering clear of this stock for now.