Investors Could Be Concerned With Southern Packaging Group's (SGX:BQP) Returns On Capital
If we're looking to avoid a business that is in decline, what are the trends that can warn us ahead of time? Typically, we'll see the trend of both return on capital employed (ROCE) declining and this usually coincides with a decreasing amount of capital employed. This reveals that the company isn't compounding shareholder wealth because returns are falling and its net asset base is shrinking. And from a first read, things don't look too good at Southern Packaging Group (SGX:BQP), so let's see why.
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for Southern Packaging Group, this is the formula:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
0.0041 = CN¥2.4m ÷ (CN¥1.1b - CN¥557m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
Therefore, Southern Packaging Group has an ROCE of 0.4%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Packaging industry average of 8.3%.
See our latest analysis for Southern Packaging Group
While the past is not representative of the future, it can be helpful to know how a company has performed historically, which is why we have this chart above. If you're interested in investigating Southern Packaging Group's past further, check out this free graph covering Southern Packaging Group's past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
What Does the ROCE Trend For Southern Packaging Group Tell Us?
We are a bit worried about the trend of returns on capital at Southern Packaging Group. About five years ago, returns on capital were 0.9%, however they're now substantially lower than that as we saw above. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. This combination can be indicative of a mature business that still has areas to deploy capital, but the returns received aren't as high due potentially to new competition or smaller margins. If these trends continue, we wouldn't expect Southern Packaging Group to turn into a multi-bagger.
While on the subject, we noticed that the ratio of current liabilities to total assets has risen to 49%, which has impacted the ROCE. Without this increase, it's likely that ROCE would be even lower than 0.4%. What this means is that in reality, a rather large portion of the business is being funded by the likes of the company's suppliers or short-term creditors, which can bring some risks of its own.
What We Can Learn From Southern Packaging Group's ROCE
In the end, the trend of lower returns on the same amount of capital isn't typically an indication that we're looking at a growth stock. Investors must expect better things on the horizon though because the stock has risen 10% in the last five years. Either way, we aren't huge fans of the current trends and so with that we think you might find better investments elsewhere.
On a final note, we found 4 warning signs for Southern Packaging Group (3 don't sit too well with us) you should be aware of.
For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.